- Forum
- Sanghas
- Dharma Forum Refugees Camp
- Dharma Refugees Forum Topics
- General Dharma Discussions
- Meditating and enjoying life.The same or different
Meditating and enjoying life.The same or different
I watched a YouTube video with a panel discussing non-duality: . Gary Weber was doing his I'm not attached to anything bit. Tim Freke took the opposite approach saying having a child changed him. He wants to taste the juice of life, being fully in the full catastrophe life. I’m with Tim. But, I’m also with Gary.
A question for all 4th path and above. When faced with a “bad” situation, say someone close to you dying, loss of a job, bad news from a medical test, and so on, are you able to be OK with it? That is, feeling the sorrow, the stress, the suffering but having a meta-peace with it?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Posts: 2333
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Sometimes we get tired of things, too, and it's not bad to move on to something new. Other times our disinclination to do something is a good pointer towards exploring why we want it to be different, what we are dissatisfied with, etc.
No idea on the latter part of your question, about Gary vs. Tim. I suspect people's views, experiences, interpretations, etc vary wildly, whether they are "awake" or not.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Posts: 6475
- Karma: 2
And... I agree with Ona that your meditation sounds like a chore - of course the joy left you. The focus of your attention became the chore and not the nice dog walk. No mystery there
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Posts: 1135
And the other complication is whether the tradition sees pleasurable experiences, or particular kinds of pleasurable experiences, as tending toward attachment and addiction.
And of course there's the question of applying different techniques at different times or according to different personality types, etc, to be taken into account when thinking about whether there is an effect of a particular practice that you like or don't like (I think the modernist traditions like Mahasi which tend to 'crown' one technique often really miss this).
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Posts: 6475
- Karma: 2
Theravada e.g., which is basically world-transcending in approach, often sees equanimity as more valuable than happiness, and that can make sense inasmuch as a lot of what people often experience as happiness is actually excitedness (having said that joy, bliss etc have important roles in various Theravada paths and in the suttas).
JMHO --
I would say, as a long time Theravada practitioner, that it can be a sticky wicket to value any emotion (aka happiness) over any other. I would further assert that at the deepest level, the objective we all seek, that's actually The View for most, if not all, of Buddhism. Whatever the tradition. That's what is meant by equanimity in Theravada. If you are placing a value on happiness over some other human reaction to conditions then you will strive to cause to arise that particular emotion, and thus begins the samsaric struggle. So the differences that I see among the Buddhist traditions isn't about the end result of the path but about the methods to use to get there. That has been my take on the thing, anyway. Others here who hail from Zen or Vajrayana traditions please jump in.
Now, if by "happiness" you meant being with and accommodating all conditions and experiences, then that's more in line with what I understand to be most of Buddhism.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
"It always really was just walking down the street"
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Interesting that Adjya had a long, intense background in meditation but doesn't teach meditation now but uses other methods.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Posts: 2333
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
His most recent (free) eBook THE WAY OF LIBERATION
www.adyashanti.org/wayofliberation/
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
every3rdthought wrote: It may also be true that different traditions, and hence techniques, have different approaches to the question of the role/relationship between happiness and awakening. Theravada e.g., which is basically world-transcending in approach, often sees equanimity as more valuable than happiness, and that can make sense inasmuch as a lot of what people often experience as happiness is actually excitedness (having said that joy, bliss etc have important roles in various Theravada paths and in the suttas).
The Dalai Lama and Thich Nhat Hanh both say happiness is the end goal of all living beings. I think happiness can be defined in several different ways. I would include equanimity and peacefulness in my definition of happiness as well as the rest of the Brahmaviharas.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
For the last several years I have tried to have one effortful meditation (4 foundations noting with and without labeling) a day and one non-dual/do nothing/just sitting effortless meditation a day. The 4 foundations meditation does seem to be effortless at times but it is appears my unconscious is doing the work not my consciousness.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.