Tony Parsons - "ultra-non-dual" teachings
15 years 11 months ago #54803
by Mike.B
Tony Parsons - "ultra-non-dual" teachings was created by Mike.B
Happy New Year Guys 
And thanks to KF for a cool site.
Any views on Mr Parsons? I had heard the name off and on but got mixed up due to there being some ex music journalist author of the same name in the UK.
Anyway for those that havent some resources ... he is the most downloaded interview on www.conscious.tv [and anyone here who hasnt seen the non-dual section should check it out] and author of several books. I think the quickest intro to his approach might be via this youtube [his conscioustv interview for those that prefer youtube to shockwave starts ]. Theres also an interesting article on his website about some ding-dong with Waite over "traditional vs neo" AV.
Anyway many roads to Rome and all that ... and actually I am reminded of Keith Dowman (prolific translator of Dzogchen texts) saying exactly the same thing in a quite difference "product surround"/"context" ... ie "there is nothing you can do to get enlightened".
This kind of line seems to me to be absolutely true but not necessarily useful in the relative sense...?
Anyway as you guys are the non-dual experts I thought I'd raise the topic here
kind regards
Mike
And thanks to KF for a cool site.
Any views on Mr Parsons? I had heard the name off and on but got mixed up due to there being some ex music journalist author of the same name in the UK.
Anyway for those that havent some resources ... he is the most downloaded interview on www.conscious.tv [and anyone here who hasnt seen the non-dual section should check it out] and author of several books. I think the quickest intro to his approach might be via this youtube [his conscioustv interview for those that prefer youtube to shockwave starts ]. Theres also an interesting article on his website about some ding-dong with Waite over "traditional vs neo" AV.
Anyway many roads to Rome and all that ... and actually I am reminded of Keith Dowman (prolific translator of Dzogchen texts) saying exactly the same thing in a quite difference "product surround"/"context" ... ie "there is nothing you can do to get enlightened".
This kind of line seems to me to be absolutely true but not necessarily useful in the relative sense...?
Anyway as you guys are the non-dual experts I thought I'd raise the topic here
kind regards
Mike